DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64782/istlj11021531Keywords:
types of leadership, political intelligence leadership, political intelligenceHighlights
Abstract
In educational environments with scarce resources, school administrators must gradually improve their management skills. Not only management skills but also IQ and EQ should be developed in a related way. Although cognitive intelligence is sufficient for management, emotional intelligence is also important for understanding people. However, in a world where power is shared, it is understood that in addition to these types of intelligence, political intelligence should also exist to manage strategic interactions. For this reason, measuring the political intelligence leadership of school administrators constitutes the problem of the study. A valid and reliable political intelligence leadership scale was developed with a sample group of 597 teachers and school administrators. It is thought that the political intelligence leadership skills of school administrators can be measured through this scale. Political intelligence leadership was analyzed in four dimensions. These are futurism, trust, purposeful empathy, and power. Through political intelligence, school administrators' ability to manage strategic interactions in schools can be revealed.
Listen to the Podcast
Share
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Adams, S. M., & Zanzi, A. (2006). Developing political intelligence for making feasible decisions. Journal of Management Development, 25(4), s. 350-367.
Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), s. 689-718.
Ashraf, F., & Iqbal, M. Z. (2011). A research agenda on the leaders’ political intelligence for effective change management. African Journal of Business Management, 5(14), s. 5798-5806. doi:10.5897/AJBM11.189
Balcı, A. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA, United States: Jossey-Bass.
Ciampa, D. (2005). Almost ready: How leaders move. Harvard Business Review Special Issue, 83(1), s. 46-53.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Demirbağ, O., & Yozgat, U. (2019). POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 7(2), s. 147-182. doi: 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2
Karasar, N. (2022). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (37. Baskı b.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Panah, E. Y., Marefat, D., & Farahmand, F. (2019). The Relationship between Political Intelligence and Verbal Intelligence with Developmental Leadership Style of Managers and Employees of the Ministry of Youth and Sports. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 5(20), s. 101-108.
Reffo, G., & Wark, V. (2017). Liderlik ve Politik Zeka (2. Baskı b.). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), s. 49-73.
Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş, Temel İlkeler ve LİSREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Eğitim ve Danışmanlık Hizmetleri, Siyasal Basın ve Dağıtım.
Vélez, F. R. (2014). Political Intelligence and National Security in Ecuador: A Retrospective Reading. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance, 2(3&4), s. 115-13636.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01.09.2025 (2)
- 26.07.2024 (1)
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Society that Learn Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
