DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64782/istlj.317779-94Keywords:
Digital Amnesia, Sociology of Education, Cultural Capital, Digital Divide, Critical PedagogyHighlights
- Digital amnesia, beyond being an individual cognitive impairment, constitutes a social phenomenon that reproduces cultural capital inequalities in the Bourdieusian sense.
- Technological dependency is transforming teacher authority and the attention economy within the classroom, thereby blurring the boundaries of pedagogical discourse.
- Critical digital literacy, school-community collaboration, and TPACK-based teacher education reform emerge as the primary sociopedagogical solutions.
Highlights
Abstract
This study examines the phenomenon of digital amnesia from the perspective of the sociology of education, analyzing the multidimensional effects of technology dependency on pedagogical practices and social inequalities. Digital amnesia, which emerges when individuals delegate the responsibility of remembering information to digital devices, has in recent years become not only a subject of cognitive psychology but also a central concern for the sociology of education. Drawing on Bourdieu's cultural capital, Bernstein's pedagogic discourse, and Freire's critical pedagogy as theoretical frameworks, this qualitative review synthesizes international literature and current statistical data. The study addresses three core dimensions. First, it examines the socioeconomic and geographical foundations of the digital divide, demonstrating that access to technology and the capacity to use it effectively constitute a new form of cultural capital in the Bourdieusian sense, thereby reproducing existing inequalities. Second, drawing on Bernstein's framework, it discusses how digital technologies transform teacher authority and how the attention economy shapes classroom dynamics. Third, it analyzes intergenerational tensions between digital natives and digital immigrants, as well as shifts in parental involvement in education. The findings indicate that digital amnesia is a multilayered and structural problem that goes far beyond an individual concern. Accordingly, the study proposes three socio-pedagogical solutions: critical digital literacy programs inspired by Freire's critical pedagogy tradition, community-school partnership digital access centers, and comprehensive teacher education reform grounded in the TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) framework.
Listen to the Podcast
Share
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Apple, M. W. (2018). The struggle for democracy in education: Lessons from social realities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315194684
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Digital-Kompass. (2024). Jahresbericht 2024: Digital-Kompass Deutschland. Bundesministerium für Digitales und Verkehr.
Eurostat. (2024). Digital economy and society statistics: Digital skills of young people. European Commission.
France Services. (2024). Rapport d'activité 2024: Maisons France Services. Agence Nationale de la Cohésion des Territoires.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Fullan, M. (2025). The new meaning of educational change (6th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Giroux, H. A. (2020). On critical pedagogy (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Gleick, J. (2011). The information: A history, a theory, a flood. Vintage Books.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Hargreaves, A., & O'Connor, M. T. (2024). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.
Hatfield, J. (2024). 72% of U.S. high school teachers say cellphone distraction is a major problem in the classroom. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/06/12/72-percent-of-us-high-school-teachers-say-cellphone-distraction-is-a-major-problem-in-the-classroom/ Hobbs, R. (2024). Media literacy in action: Connecting theory and practice (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Kaspersky Lab. (2015). The rise and impact of digital amnesia [White paper]. Kaspersky Lab.
Kanbay, Y., Babaoğlu, E., Yalçintürk, A. A., & Akçam, A. (2025). Digital amnesia: The erosion of memory. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar—Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 17(3), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1539145
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2023). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574231190711
Lewis, C., & Takahashi, A. (2023). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Routledge.
Linderoth, J. (2022). The attention economy in classrooms: How digital distractions reshape learning. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(3), 156-172. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.3.3
Livingstone, S. (2024). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. New York University Press.
Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2022). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford University Press.
Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the Internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 22(5), 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415595005
Mangen, A. (2022). Reading digital texts: Why deep reading matters. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(3), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X221116580 Mark, G. (2023). Attention span: A groundbreaking way to restore balance, happiness and productivity. Hanover Square Press.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2023). Pandemi sonrası dijital eğitim raporu. MEB Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Musheshe, M., & Chrispo, M. (2025). A conceptual study of cognitive atrophy in Homo sapiens through a Darwinian analysis of overreliance on artificial intelligence. East African Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajis.8.2.3463
OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
Oleshko, V., & Gavrilova, E. (2021). Digital amnesia among Russian youth: Causes and consequences. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities, 14(5), 678-689. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0752
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press.
Razi, A., & Namvarpour, M. (2026, Nisan). Teen overreliance on AI companion chatbots: Behavioral patterns and design implications. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems’nde sunulan bildiri. Drexel Üniversitesi ETHOS Laboratuvarı.
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Singh, P., Kumar, V., & Sharma, N. (2024). Smartphone dependency and digital amnesia among Indian youth: A demographic analysis. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 89, Article 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103789
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
Swaminathan, S. (2020). Digital amnesia in higher education: A study of Indian university students. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 2(3), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2020.2.3.3
Türkiye Eğitim Gönüllüleri Vakfı [TEGV]. (2020). COVID-19 dönemi TEGV çocukları uzaktan eğitim durum değerlendirme raporu. TEGV. https://tegv.org/dosyalar/covid-19-donemi-uzaktan-egitim-durum-degerlendirme-raporu.pdf
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.
Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generations: The real differences between Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, boomers, and silents—and what they mean for America's future. Atria Books.
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [TÜİK]. (2024). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması, 2024. TÜİK. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2024-53492
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2023). Digital skills and inequality in the platform economy. Information, Communication & Society, 26(8), 1567-1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2174789
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Weinberger, D. (2019). Everyday chaos: Technology, complexity, and how we're thriving in a new world of possibility. Harvard Business Review Press.
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. HarperCollins.
World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0428-0
Zhang, S., & Li, S. (2025). How short video addiction affects risk decision-making behavior in college students based on fNIRS technology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 19, Article 1542271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1542271
World Bank. (2024). World development report 2024: The middle-income trap. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2017-4
Zhao, Y. (2024). Reimagining education: The international science and evidence based education assessment. UNESCO MGIEP.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Society that Learn Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
